Crime Topics Menu
Doogue & O'Brien Testimonials
"I don't think I could have coped if I lost my trial. The preparation you put in was amazing."
Gary F
"I was proud that we stood up and fought the charges. I would have lost everything if I had been found guilty."
Peter L
"Your compassion during my time of need was outstanding. Many thanks."
Cameron A
"Lots of people kept telling me I should plead guilty except for your firm. You were right."
Lee W
"Everyone was judging me except for you. That support really helped me get through a terrible time."
John A
Sexual offences against persons with a cognitive impairment by D...
Sexual offences against persons with a cognitive impairment by Doctors etc
We run and win a lot of jury trials on sex cases. The key to fighting sex charges is preparation.
We have a great deal of experience in these matters. We know that innocent people sometimes get accused of terrible crimes.
If you have been charged with a sex offence, please contact us immediately by calling 03 9670 5111 or book an appointment to meet with one of our lawyers.
What the Law states - Sexual offences against persons with a cognitive impairment by Doctors etc
Crimes Act 1958 - SECT 51
Sexual offences against persons with a cognitive impairment by providers of medical or therapeutic services
51. Sexual offences against persons with a cognitive impairment by providers of medical or therapeutic services
(1) A person who provides medical or therapeutic services to a person with a cognitive impairment who is not his or her spouse or domestic partner must not take part in an act of sexual penetration with that person.
Penalty: Level 5 imprisonment (10 years maximum).
(2) A person who provides medical or therapeutic services to a person with a cognitive impairment who is not his or her spouse or domestic partner must not commit, or be in any way a party to the commission of, an indecent act with that person.
Penalty: Level 6 imprisonment (5 years maximum).
(3) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1) or (2) in circumstances in which the services provided by the accused were related to the cognitive impairment of the other person, it is a defence to the charge for the accused to prove on the balance of probabilities that at the time at which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the other person did not have a cognitive impairment.
(4) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1) or (2) in circumstances in which the services provided by the accused were not related to the cognitive impairment of the other person, it is a defence to the charge for the accused to prove on the balance of probabilities that at the time at
which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused was not aware that the other person had a cognitive impairment.
(5) Consent is not a defence to a charge against subsection (1) or (2) unless the accused satisfies the court on the balance of probabilities that at the time at which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused believed on reasonable grounds that he or she was the spouse or domestic
partner of the other person.
(6) If consent is relevant to a charge against subsection (1) or (2), the prosecution bears the burden of proving lack of consent.
Maximum Penalty in Victoria
5 - 10 years depending on the subsection
What the Prosecution must prove - Sexual offences against persons with a cognitive impairment by Doctors etc - Vic
(a) The accused provided medical or therapeutic services to another person.
(b) The other person had a cognitive impairment.
(c) The other person was not the spouse or de facto of the accused.
(d) The accused took part in an act of sexual penetration with that person or committed or was a party to the commission of an indecent act with that person.
Possible Defences - Sexual offences against persons with a cognitive impairment by Doctors etc
(a) Consent.
(b) Factual dispute.
(c) Identification dispute.
Which court will hear the charge of Sexual offences against persons with a cognitive impairment by Doctors etc
County Court.
