Please upgrade your web browser as Internet Explorer 6 is no longer supported. Upgrade to IE8 or Install Firefox.


blackBar.jpg, 320B

Crime Topics Menu

blackBar.jpg, 320B

Doogue & O'Brien Testimonials

"I don't think I could have coped if I lost my trial. The preparation you put in was amazing."

Gary F

"I was proud that we stood up and fought the charges. I would have lost everything if I had been found guilty."

Peter L

"Your compassion during my time of need was outstanding. Many thanks."

Cameron A

"Lots of people kept telling me I should plead guilty except for your firm. You were right."

Lee W

"Everyone was judging me except for you. That support really helped me get through a terrible time."

John A

Appeal on basis of manifest excess

BlackMenuBar.jpg, 340B

Written by
Bill Doogue
Criminal Defence Lawyer

Contact Bill Doogue 

03 9670 5111


An Article about Appeal on basis of manifest excess


Appeal to Court of Appeal on basis of Manifest excess

 

The most common type of sentence appeal is that the sentence was manifestly excessive. That is that the penalty received was obviously too harsh. There may be a number of other appeal grounds or combinations of appeal grounds that can be submitted after carefully looking at all the papers in your case. Appeals are often expensive and time consuming and you should be clear that your lawyers understand what they are doing before you lodge an appeal.

 

Below is a definition of manifiest excess form case law. It is making the point that it is obvious if something is manifestly excessive. It is not something that needs to be argued much - it either is or it isn't.

"As all members of the High Court stated in Lowndes v. The Queen, the discretion which the law commits to sentencing judges is of vital importance in the administration of our system of criminal justice. For the appellate court to interfere the sentence must be "unreasonable or plainly unjust". Now, manifest excessiveness, like manifest inadequacy, is a conclusion.

It is a conclusion which does not depend upon attribution of identified specific error in the reasoning of the sentencing judge and it frequently does not admit of much amplification."

 

 


blackBar.jpg, 320B